StarCraft Wiki
Register
Advertisement
StarCraft Wiki

Abathur tells Kerrigan the primal Hydralisk was "stolen" from the swarm. This is likely the same for the Roach, but there is no hint that it happened to Zerglings. Considering they have the primal basic appearance I doubt it was the case.--SoulFilcher (talk) 13:31, May 22, 2013 (UTC)

The zergling's origin was on Zz'gash, a world just outside of protoss space. Pretty much every primal zerg strain was stolen. The viper and swarm host seem like the only exceptions to the rule. PSH aka Kimera 757 (talk) contribs) 13:45, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
I know, but I suspect the primal zergling and ultralisk only have those names because they fill a similar role. Without a clear statement that they were in fact stolen from the swarm I wouldn't add that piece of information to this page. This is just my opinion and I felt like I needed to warn about it.--SoulFilcher (talk) 13:55, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
Right after I read your comment, I removed the reference from the page. (It's probably true, but it wasn't referenced.) PSH aka Kimera 757 (talk) contribs) 14:04, May 22, 2013 (UTC)

Clarify on worker status.[]

Figured i'd actually ask in this case.

The unit has a gather ability, and if they player is somehow able to get control of them in a mineral-field situation they can mine, same with extractors. In addition they were capable of doing so in Dehaka's initial co-op release before it was removed (as it was likely unintended in that regard) for the second. Still, given that they: Are workers in the campaign in regards to having the ability to harvest resources but not build structures (much like a MULE), and were workers for at least one patch of co-op and saw usage, it it not plausible to list them with at least a note? Nolanstar (talk) 05:25, January 14, 2019 (UTC)

Advertisement