Xel'Naga-created?[]
Just a bit of a continuity error I noticed: The battle.net downloadable map featuring warp gates says that they are xel'naga sturctures, but Ulrezaj uses one in Enslavers II on a space platform (which should not have existed at the time of xel'naga being active.) Unless the xel'naga were active at that time (which someone would have noticed) or the protoss have learned to make them (which, as far as we know, they still haven't) the warp gates cannot be xel'naga structures. --Thebrowncloud 02:09, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- The protoss do know how to make gates, just not ones as sophisticated as the xel'naga originals. - Meco (talk) 02:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Exile of the Dark Templar[]
If there was a warp gate that led to Shakuras since the xel'naga were on Aiur, couldn't the Dark Templar just have taken that instead of being forced to take a valuable xel'naga ship with them? I suppose this would be a continuity error as well... --Thebrowncloud 02:09, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- That wouldn't be a continuity error; there's no contradiction of facts. There's just some question about the Conclave's motives, assuming the protoss remembered the gate was there, and the gate was functional at the time. - Meco (talk) 02:36, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
I doubt the Conclave knew about the warp gate on Shakuras. The warp gate on Aiur can connect to any other warp gate, not just one on Shakuras, but presumably every other world the protoss knew about that had a gate on it would have been a protoss colony already. In the map Warp Gates, the protoss discovered a new world with warp gates, which they presumably couldn't find just by activating the Aiur gate(s). PSH aka Kimera 757 (talk) 04:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)