wait, is you battle net ID Just Hawki or Hawki2?

I remember seeing you on battle.net, cool.

I was digging through the SCM files again. If you check Operation Claws, each player gets a Commander. (Players 2 and 4 are the playable ... players.) Perhaps we shouldn't associate that commander with the Magistrate then.

Then those references are mislabeled. :(

That document was the BW rules document, not the FQ. Only Hydrax and (whatever) Station were from the FAQ.

Sorry, I mean, there were four PDFs. Was all the info from the same one?

For the board game info, all the links you've used say "Brood War FAQ PDF". Does all the info come from there?

I was just reading through the Brood War rules PDF (not the FAQ) and it mentioned Moria being a super-large planet. I don't believe I saw that in the FAQ PDF, although I could easily have missed that.

Same thing for Dylar IV being a gas giant in those PDFs; I can't find that. :(

I don't think a single gameplay article will work. If we get something equally large for SC2 marine gameplay, that would make for a huge combined article. On the other hand I can get behind going back to having "Marine" holding lore and stuff, instead of "Marine (lore)". That would get rid of the disamb page.

In general, I'm assuming Klomer will radically boost the size of the SC1 game sections, and getting those SC1 articles up sets the ground work for that. Similarly, if we're resolved to see SC2 game sections (at least for units that will appear either in multiplayer or in campaign) grow in future we may as well get those separated out now and get a head start on relinking.

The firebat SC2 article probably is superfluous.

Hey, I'm just here to talk about this article: http://starcraft.wikia..._rifle&oldid=59814 It's not a screenshot from starcraft ghost. It's a render from 3ds max, by a guy named spacesepp from 2007. It was submitted to starcraft.org, but unfortunately that site no longer has any of its fan art on it. He made it while working on the mod Sons of War, which I was also a part of. He had a pretty nice marine model that he was working on for our cinematics, but it had a really crappy gun model. So I drew up a crappy concept art of a gauss rifle and he added this new one to his marine. Then, for fun he made a mockup first person shooter render. You'll notice that nothing at all about the picture looks like SCG; it's first person, has a completely different HUD, health/ammo system and crosshairs, and has lighting much much too sophisticated for games. I couldn't think of a real way to prove this to you, but I've done the best I can; I've taken pictures from when we were actually working on that marine, and I've got a picture of the original topic where he showed off that render. The name "AGR-17" was an accident, one of our guys thought that that was the name of the gauss rifle and told spacesepp to put it in. I corrected to C-17, but he never fixed it. Here's all the stuff I could find: http://www.fileden.com...266471/AGR-17proof.zip Please remove the article; it's a misnamed fan made model on a crappy fan made sketch. We replaced it with a better one anyway. http://www.fileden.com...1266471/gaussrifle.jpg

Alright, hopefully that calm down that page.