Should we remove all contractions? I thought some looked professional.

I added minor since you seemed interested in putting all characters in the books. If Meco disagrees though I'll have to talk to him about it.

Seems like the plan. Which third heading? For some books (eg Nova, Dark Templar Saga (I need to separate the historical characters from the current ones), etc there will need to be more headings). In many cases, you can put subheadings under minor, then put the characters in the scrollbox template so the list doesn't seem too long.

Good luck in the Blizzard contest. I was considering entering myself but realized I couldn't make it in time. I have long lead times when writing, and the only piece I had which was long enough was still in progress and was not exactly a SC-as-we-know-it sort of thing.

According to the logs it was three months between my first registered user edit and being promoted to sysop. (Alas, I can not find the rollback log entries.)

Ah, mediumish story. The short version is I started as a drive-by-editor, had just discovered the SC wiki and made edits for the heck of it. I did this for a few months and was given first rollback rights then sysop rights by PSH. I guess that helped secure the small amount of psychological capital I'd ended up investing. Over time things snowballed and the rest, as they say, is logged.

I help out on the wiki's presentation and organization. Can't neglect those! :)

I can't say I've read Hybrid or Revelations. I'm a bit weak all-round when it comes to SC, lore and gameplay wise. :lol:

I can get behind "Supporting". :)

I think we should just keep it to two subsections. The problem is finding a name for the "not-main" section. I guess we could just use "other".